WELCOME

The best advice I can give is from a talk by Elder Oaks: ”Last year a church member sent me a suggestion that someone prepare a book containing all General Authority interpretations of all verses in the scriptures. I replied that I thought this was not a good idea…. What we are seeking to accomplish… is not to magnify the standing of the prophets but to elevate the spirituality of our rank and file members. Like Moses, we declare, ‘would God that all the Lord’s people were prophets, and that the Lord would put his spirit upon them!’ (Numbers 11:29). We encourage everyone to study the scriptures prayerfully and seek personal revelation to know the meaning for themselves.” (Elder Dallin H. Oaks, “Scripture Reading and Revelation”, BYU Studies Academy Meeting, January 29, 1993)

Monday, January 7, 2019

NT Come Follow Me -Individual-2019-January 21–27


Come Follow Me Individual Lesson 4

John 1

 The Gospel of John

Who was John?

The Testimony of St. John

Taken from https://www.gospeldoctrine.com/new-testament/john/john-1
The more one reads the Gospel of John, the more one is impressed with how different this record is from the synoptic gospels. You can almost imagine John, the last surviving apostle, reviewing the records of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, and then concluding that there were many precious morsels left out. This romantic notion-that John was trying to fill in precious gaps in the scriptural history-is not just speculation. Robert L. Millet wrote:

"One ancient tradition states that after Mark and Luke had published their Gospels, John 'admitted them, giving his testimony to their truth.' John, however, recognizing the fact that 'the other three evangelists only wrote the deeds of our Lord for one year after the imprisonment of John the Baptist,' set out to fill in those historical gaps of the synoptic Gospels. 'John, it is said, being entreated to undertake it, wrote the account of the time not recorded by the former evangelists, and the deeds done by our Savior, which they have passed by.' It is reasonable to suppose that John collected and drew upon available sources beyond his own personal records (such as the record of John the Baptist). If indeed John's Gospel was written last, it may well be-in those few areas where his Gospel follows the course of the synoptics-that he would have been acquainted with, had before him, and thus utilized in a discerning manner details from the other three Gospels." (Selected Writings of Robert L. Millet: Gospel Scholars Series [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 2000], 21.)

Consider what a great tragedy it would have been if John had not written his gospel. We would be missing: Christ turning the water into wine (Jn. 2), the interaction between Jesus and Nicodemus (Jn. 3), the passage 'For God so loved the world' (Jn 3:16), the Bread of Life sermon (Jn. 6), the story of the adulterous woman (Jn. 8), the passage 'other sheep I have, which are not of this fold' (Jn. 10:16), the raising of Lazarus from the dead (Jn. 11), the washing of the apostles' feet (Jn. 13), precious doctrines taught during the last supper (Jn. 13-16), the intercessory prayer (Jn. 17), and the conversation of the resurrected Lord with Peter and John (Jn. 21). Furthermore, the tone, style, and content of John's writings are unique and truly sublime.

"In the first four lines we sense already a quality unique to the Gospel of John. It is the same Savior that we knew in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, but now we see him in a new light, with new dimensions of greatness and godhood unfolding before our understanding. This is not just the Messiah of the Jews; this is 'the light' of the whole world, the creator of 'all things.' He 'was with God.' He 'was God.' But he was a God who 'was made flesh and dwelt among us' (John 1:14), and so was known to men-to some only at a distance, to some secondhand. But to a few he was known closely, intimately. And it is the voice of one of those intimates that speaks to us in this Gospel. John, the beloved apostle, had not only heard the words of the living Lord, he had 'leaned on his breast at supper.' (John 21:20.) He not only knew the teachings of Jesus, he knew, in a way we can hardly appreciate, the stirrings of that divine heart. It is the profound depths of that heart and the infinite heights of that divine glory that John presents for us in his Gospel.

"No other single piece fuses so remarkably the mortal and the immortal, the finite and the infinite: a draught of water from a well becomes a metaphor for the living water of the gospel; the bread to feed five thousand becomes a lesser symbol for the more significant bread of life after partaking of which there will be no hunger. The sheep and their shepherd, the vine and its branches, the very stuff of human existence is shown to have meaning and significance far beyond what our own dull senses have suggested." (Neal E. Lambert and Richard H. Cracroft, "The Powerful Voices of the Gospels," New Era, Jan. 1973, 42)

Gordon B. Hinckley

"I like to read the Gospel of John. Over sixty years ago my missionary companion and I started reading the Gospel of John which begins with that great opening statement, 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.' Our reading of the Gospel of John did something to me. And I still love to read the Gospel of John.

'For God so loved the world, that he sent his only begotten son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life' (John 3:16).

'Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid' (John 14:27).

"Those are great and marvelous statements that I learned to love in the Gospel of John. We need to do more reading in the scriptures and more dwelling on the Lord Jesus Christ." (Teachings of Gordon B. Hinckley [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1997], 279.)

 John 1:1–5

Jesus Christ was “in the beginning with God.”

My Thoughts: We know that Christ was the God of the Old Testament. He created this earth under the direction on the Father. These verses help me to understand just how much Christ is involed and cares about me. He has been there as my friend and advocate since the very start

What Others have Said:
Bruce R McConkie
From latter-day revelation we learn that the material in the forepart of the gospel of John (the Apostle, Revelator, and Beloved Disciple) was written originally by John the Baptist. By revelation the Lord restored to Joseph Smith part of what John the Baptist had written and promised to reveal the balance when men became sufficiently faithful to warrant receiving it. (D. & C. 93: 6-18.) Verse 15 of this passage is the key to the identity of the particular John spoken of. This verse should be compared with Matt. 3:16-17 to learn the identity of the writer.
Even without revelation, however, it should be evident that John the Baptist had something to do with the recording of events in the forepart of John's gospel, for some of the occurrences include his conversations with the Jews and a record of what he saw when our Lord was baptized-all of which matters would have been unknown to John the Apostle whose ministry began somewhat later than that of the Baptist's. There is little doubt but that the Beloved Disciple had before him the Baptist's account when he wrote his gospel. The latter John either copied or paraphrased[…]”Doctrinal New Testament Commentary
“Though many of the Jews in the meridian of time were in a state of direful and awful apostasy, such darkness of mind and spirit was not universal. It did not envelope the whole nation. Elizabeth and Zacharias were righteous saints. Both were lineal descendants of Aaron, and Zacharias held the office of priest in the Aaronic Priesthood. (Teachings, pp. 272-273.) This lesser priesthood had continued in direct descent, without a break in the line, from Aaron to Zacharias and his son John the Baptist. (D. & C. 84:26-28.)”Doctrinal New Testament Commentary
Joseph Fielding Smith

"[These verses] teach that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and that he was in the beginning with the Father, and by him the world was created, and all things were made (organized) by him.

"Our learned enemies of the Gospel and the divine mission of Jesus Christ, in their overwhelming conceit, will not have it so. They have rejected Jesus Christ as the Son of God. They have rejected him as the Redeemer of the world and the Savior of men. They have denied his Godhood and his resurrection, while they condescendingly permit him to be a merciful and moral teacher of mankind. In fact they think they have learned through their study of science that God could not possibly be an exalted man. He could not be the Father of Jesus Christ in the literal sense as being the Father of his body, for to them God is a force, an influence, a mystery which no man can solve. They have universally ridiculed the idea that there can be an Eternal Father, who could create man in his own image, in the likeness of his body, for their god has no body, he is too great, too mighty, to be confined in a body limited to the dimensions of a man." (Man, His Origin and Destiny [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1954], 61.)

Gordon B. Hinckley

"When I think of the Savior, I think of the words of Matthew, Mark, and Luke but particularly the words of John:

"Here is something spoken of more than a babe in a manger; here is declared the Creator of all that is good and beautiful. I have looked at majestic mountains rising against a blue sky and thought of Jesus, the Creator of heaven and earth. I have stood on a spit of sand in the Pacific and watched the dawn rise like thunder-a ball of gold surrounded by clouds of pink and white and purple-and thought of Jesus, the Word by whom all things were made and without whom was not anything made that was made. I have seen a beautiful child-many of them-bright-eyed, innocent, clean, and trusting, and marveled at the majesty and miracle of creation. What then shall you do with Jesus that is called Christ?

"This earth is his creation. When we make it ugly, we offend him." ("God So Loved the World," New Era, Apr. 1983, 48)

Howard W. Hunter

"The message of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is that there is but one guiding hand in the universe, only one truly infallible light, one unfailing beacon to the world. That light is Jesus Christ, the light and life of the world, the light which one Book of Mormon prophet described as 'a light that is endless, that can never be darkened' (Mosiah 16:9).

"As we search for the shore of safety and peace, whether we be individual women and men, families, communities, or nations, Christ is the only beacon on which we can ultimately rely." (The Teachings of Howard W. Hunter, edited by Clyde J. Williams [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1997], 42.)

What is the JST?


Joseph Smith’s Inspired Translation of the New Testament (Ensign Dec 1986)

Speaking of the Lord’s plans for the “doctrinal restoration,” Elder Bruce R. McConkie stated: “It was his design and purpose to bring forth the Book of Mormon as a new and added witness of the Lord Jesus Christ. Then he would endow his prophets with keys and power and give them direct revelation as to how and in what manner his earthly kingdom should be established anew among men.

“After this—as a crowning achievement—he would begin the perfection of the Bible, a work destined to be greater and have more significance than any of us have yet realized.”

Continuing, Elder McConkie observed: “Thus, the doctrinal restoration is destined to come to pass, first, through the Book of Mormon, second, by direct revelation—a re-revelation—of the doctrines known anciently, and third, by the restoration, by revelation, of [parts of] the Bible, which in spite of its faults has been the most stabilizing force on earth since the day it came into being.” (As quoted in The Joseph Smith Translation: The Restoration of Plain and Precious Things, ed. Monte S. Nyman and Robert L. Millet, Provo, Utah: Religious Studies Center, 1985, pp. 10, 12.)

The work of biblical revision was a mission appointed to the Prophet Joseph Smith (see D&C 76:15); it was an integral “branch of [his] calling.” (History of the Church, 1:238.) The Latter-day Saints came to rejoice in the fact that the Bible was “undergoing the purifying touch by a revelation of Jesus Christ.” (The Latter-day Saints’ Messenger and Advocate, Dec. 1835, p. 229.)

On page one of New Testament Manuscript #1 is the following inscription: “A Translation of the New Testament translated by the power of God.” (See Robert J. Matthews, “A Plainer Translation”: Joseph Smith’s Translation of the Bible, A History and Commentary, Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 1975, p. 267.) Working under the influence of the spirit of revelation, the Prophet altered some 2,096 verses in the King James text of the New Testament—in addition to his work on the Old Testament. It isn’t possible to discuss here all of the changes. But let’s look at some important doctrinal contributions from the JST of the New Testament.

The early years of Christ. In the infancy narrative, we note a reference in the JST which refers to Jesus as the Messiah, as well as the king. The wise men from the east, seeking to behold and participate in the marvelous event at hand, asked, “Where is the child that is born, the Messiah of the Jews?” (JST, Matt. 2:2; italics added.)

In a passage that does not occur in the King James Version, the JST gives us a remarkable insight into the childhood and early preparation of Christ:

“And it came to pass that Jesus grew up with his brethren, and waxed strong, and waited upon the Lord for the time of his ministry to come.

“And he served under his father, and he spake not as other men, neither could he be taught; for he needed not that any man should teach him.

“And after many years, the hour of his ministry drew nigh.

“And in those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judea.” (JST, Matt. 3:24–26; Matt. 3:1.)

These verses supply an excellent transition between Christ’s infancy and the beginning of John’s ministry.(Note the lack of transition in the KJV from Matt. 2:23 to Matt. 3:1.) They also explain that the Lord received instructions from the heavens. This suggests one of the reasons Jesus, at age twelve, was spiritually adept and insightful enough to be found in the temple teaching the doctors of the law.(See JST, Luke 2:46–47.)

The ministry of John the Baptist. Jesus taught that “among those that are born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist.” (Luke 7:28.) Joseph Smith explained that John’s greatness consisted largely of his critically important mission to prepare the way for the Son of Man and then baptize the Lord by proper authority. (See Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pp. 275–76.) John “came into the world for a witness, to bear witness of the light, to bear record of the gospel through the Son, unto all, that through him men might believe.” (JST, John 1:7; italics added.)

The JST provides a clearer rendition of John’s preaching and baptism than that contained in other translations. Note the following:

KJV, Matt. 3:11–12

 “I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire: “Whose fan is in his hand.”

JST, Matt. 3:38–39

“I indeed baptize you with water, upon your repentance; and when he of whom I bear record cometh, who is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear, (or whose place I am not able to fill,) as I said, I indeed baptize you before he cometh, that when he cometh he may baptize you with the Holy Ghost and fire.

“And it is he of whom I shall bear record, whose fan shall be in his hand.” (Italics added.)

John was a prophet who spoke with power. His message not only touched the hearts of the common people, but also stirred both fear and respect in some of the leaders of the Jews. For example, “Herod feared John, knowing that he was a just man, and a holy man, and one who feared God and observed to worship him; and when he heard him he did many things for him, and heard him gladly.” (JST, Mark 6:21; italics added.)

Further, John the Baptist’s message included more than announcing the coming Messiah. In the JST, specific doctrines preached by John are given—doctrines that are absent from the King James Bible and that provide a crucial bridge between the events of the Savior’s first and second comings.

“And he [John] came into all the country about Jordan, preaching the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins.

“As it is written in the book of the prophet Esaias; and these are the words, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, and make his paths straight.

“For behold, and lo, he shall come, as it is written in the book of the prophets, to take away the sins of the world, and to bring salvation unto the heathen nations, to gather together those who are lost, who are of the sheepfold of Israel;

“Yea, even the dispersed and afflicted; and also to prepare the way, and make possible the preaching of the gospel unto the Gentiles;

“And to be a light unto all who sit in darkness, unto the uttermost parts of the earth; to bring to pass the resurrection from the dead, and to ascend up on high, to dwell on the right hand of the Father,

“Until the fulness of time, and the law and the testimony shall be sealed, and the keys of the kingdom shall be delivered up again unto the Father;

“To administer justice unto all; to come down in judgment upon all, and to convince all the ungodly of their ungodly deeds, which they have committed; and all this in the day that he shall come;

“For it is a day of power; yea, every valley shall be filled, and every mountain and hill shall be brought low; the crooked shall be made straight, and the rough ways made smooth;

“And all flesh shall see the salvation of God.” (JST, Luke 3:3–11.)

Jesus and the Jews. The leaders of the Jews in the first century had perverted the law of Moses through confusing tokens with covenants, ritual with religion, means with ends. Jesus came as the pure fulfillment of the Law and sought to heal the spiritual blindness that had come from “looking beyond the mark.” (Jacob 4:14.) The JST is even more clear than the KJV, revealing Jesus’ challenge to the Jewish intellectuals of his day in the form of a call to a higher righteousness. He questioned their authority, their right to teach and guide the masses in accordance with their narrow interpretation of the Law. The Jewish leaders were deeply schooled in commentary upon the Torah, but lacked the animation that comes with the Spirit of God. Jesus was different; he “taught them as one having authority from God, and not as having authority from the Scribes.” (JST, Matt. 7:37; italics added.)

Some of the most important alterations made by the Prophet Joseph Smith are in the Sermon on the Mount. For one thing, the JST witnesses that this sermon was predominantly for the purpose of apostlic preparation. Note that the following section on judging righteously (chapter seven) is followed in the JST by a scathing denunciation: “And Jesus said unto his disciples, Beholdest thou the Scribes, and the Pharisees, and the Priests, and the Levites? They teach in their synagogues, but do not observe the law, nor the commandments; and all have gone out of the way, and are under sin.

“Go thou and say unto them, Why teach ye men the law and the commandments, when ye yourselves are the children of corruption?

“Say unto them, Ye hypocrites, [note here who it is that the Lord calls a hypocrite], first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.” (JST, Matt. 7:6–8.)

Many of the Jews of Christ’s day had reached a state of sterile self-sufficiency wherein they trusted alone in the Law. “We ourselves are righteous,” they were prone to say, “and need not that any man should teach us.” (JST, Matt. 7:14.) Because some had “taken away the key of knowledge, the fulness of the scriptures” (JST, Luke 11:53), people stumbled in spiritual matters. Many of the leaders of the Jews no longer trusted in the efficacy of personal prayer and the spirit of revelation; others had come to doubt the very existence of God. (See JST, Luke 16:19–21.) Those in the meridian of time who were earnest in their hearts partook of the living fruit from the living tree of life offered by Christ and his appointed servants; those who rejected the fruit denied themselves access to God’s new covenant with Israel and spurned fellowship with the Mediator of that covenant.

Doctrinal teachings of Paul. We will here consider segments of two of the Apostle Paul’s epistles—doctrinal areas which have been misunderstood for centuries. Again, through the clarifying lenses provided by the JST, matters which seemed obscure or foreign are made plain and inspiring.

Chapter seven of Romans might well be labeled “Paul: Before and After.” It might also be classified as an explanation of how the power of Christ can change men’s lives. In the King James Version, Paul sounds very much like a helpless and largely depraved individual who has little power to choose good and live according to the things of God. Paul is “carnal, sold under sin.” (Rom. 7:14.) Further, those things which he knows he should do, he does not do; that which he should not do, he does. “Now then it is no more I that do it,” he adds, “but sin that dwelleth in me.” (Rom. 7:17.) It is not difficult to understand how many, from Augustine to Luther to Bible students in our own day, could conclude from Romans 7 that man is basically a depraved creature, incapable of moving in wisdom’s paths.

Through the Prophet’s inspired translation, we come to discern more clearly the character of Paul the Apostle. The JST stresses man’s inabilities to effect righteousness without Christ:

“For we know that the commandment is spiritual; but when I was under the law, I was yet carnal, sold under sin.

“But now I am spiritual; for that which I am commanded to do, I do; and that which I am commanded not to allow, I allow not.

“For what I know is not right I would not do; for that which is sin, I hate.”

Continuing, Paul stated: “Now then, it is no more I that do sin; but I seek to subdue that sin which dwelleth in me.

“For I know that in me, that is, in my flesh, dwelleth no good thing; for to will is present with me, but to perform that which is good I find not, only in Christ.” (JST, Rom. 7:14–16, 18–19; italics added.)

Secondly, some Latter-day Saints have concluded that Paul’s discussion of marriage in 1 Corinthians 7 is inconsistent with the other teachings of the restored gospel. In the King James Version of this chapter, we find the following: “Now concerning virgins. … I suppose therefore that this [the unmarried state] is good for the present distress, I say, that it is good for a man so to be. …

“But this I say, brethren, the time is short: it remaineth, that both they that have wives be as though they had none.” (1 Cor. 7:25–26, 29.) Now note the same verses from the JST: “Now concerning virgins. … I suppose therefore that this is good for the present distress, for a man so to remain that he may do greater good. …

“But I speak unto you who are called unto the ministry. For this I say, brethren, the time that remaineth is but short, that ye shall be sent forth unto the ministry. Even they who have wives, shall be as though they had none; for ye are called and chosen to do the Lord’s work.” (JST, 1 Cor. 7:25–26, 29; italics added.)

The JST restores the needful insight that Paul was addressing himself to members of the Church who had been called as missionaries, those for whom the postponement of marriage would be most appropriate. Of this contribution from the JST, Robert J. Matthews has written: “Paul’s counsel is similar to that given in the Church today, as established in the mission field and as obeyed by the young elders and sisters. Many have had the experience of listening to a mission president counsel the elders and sisters to remain at arm’s length while on the mission assignment and then preach marriage to the people of the mission. (As Paul does in 1 Cor. 11:11; Heb. 13:4.) If all we knew was the instruction given to the missionaries, we would have an incomplete sampling of the teachings of the Church, and consequently an incorrect notion. In like manner, 1 Corinthians 7 is not a true picture of Paul’s whole concept of marriage, but is directed to a temporary situation in the lives of those called into the ministry. There is no contradiction, simply a change in situation.” (“A Plainer Translation,” p. 358.)

Conclusion
Latter-day revelation sheds a brilliant light upon the Bible and allows those who seek to read by that light to become more acquainted with the doings and doctrines of prophets and seers who preceded us by many centuries. In particular, the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Joseph Smith Translation of the scriptures provide a treasure-house of knowledge concerning the Lord Jesus Christ and the former-day Saints. Another entire area of study (beyond the scope of this article) is the Prophet Joseph Smith’s sermons and addresses, many of which contain the Prophet’s explanation and discussion of biblical passages. (See Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith. See also The Words of Joseph Smith, ed. Andrew F. Ehat and Lyndon W. Cook, Provo, Utah: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 1980.)

Latter-day revelation both confirms and clarifies many of the vital verities contained in the biblical record. We are deeply indebted to the Prophet Joseph Smith and other living oracles of this dispensation for receiving the revelations, collecting the revelations, printing and publishing the revelations, and thus making available to the Saints plain and precious principles once had by earlier peoples. May the Lord grant us the wisdom to walk in the light of those great beacons of understanding which he has revealed in our day.

“Thou Shalt Bring Forth a Son,” by Harry Anderson. © Pacific Press Publishing Association; used by permission.

“Prepare Ye the Way,” by Harry Anderson. © Pacific Press Publishing Association; used by permission.

“Rise and Walk,” by Harry Anderson. © Pacific Press Publishing Association; used by permission.

“For the Great Millennium Shall Come,” by Harry Anderson. © Review and Herald Publishing Association; used by permission.

Show References

Robert L. Millet, a member of the General Church Curriculum Committee, is an assistant professor of ancient scripture at BYU.

 John 1:1-18

 Why do you think that John began his Gospel with these truths?
My Thoughts: John was writing his account after everyone else. He also had access to many records that were kept that are now lost to us. I think he wanted to show the world the Christ that he knew. The loving from the beginning creator that the other writers had missed.

John 1:12
What does it mean to “become the sons of God”?
My Thoughts: No matter what else we might accomplish or not in this life, no one can take away the title Child of God. We need to remember this as we are beat upon by life. We have a royal, God like pedigree.

John 1:18

Has anyone seen God?

My Thoughts: The manual covers what I think. God the Father deals with us through His Son. Christ is our advocate or representative with the Father.
The world at large and Satan would love nothing more than Gods children to believe they do not have access to Him or His love.

 John 1:19–23
Who is Elias, and who is “that prophet”?

Bruce R. McConkie
"What concerns us above all else as to the coming of John...is that he came with power and authority. He first received his errand from the Lord. His was no ordinary message, and he was no unauthorized witness. He was called of God and sent by him, and he represented Deity in the words that he spoke and the baptisms he performed...Luke says: 'The word of God came unto John the son of Zacharias in the wilderness.' Later John is to say: 'He that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me,' such and such things. (John 1:33.) Who sent him we do not know. We do know that 'he was baptized while he was yet in his childhood [meaning, when he was eight years of age], and was ordained by the angel of God at the time he was eight days old unto this power [note it well, not to the Aaronic Priesthood, but] to overthrow the kingdom of the Jews, and to make straight the way of the Lord before the face of his people, to prepare them for the coming of the Lord, in whose hand is given all power.' (D&C 84:24.)" (The Mortal Messiah: From Bethlehem to Calvary, 4 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979-1981], 1: 384.)

 
John 1:35–46

 What does your family learn from the people described in these verses about how to share the gospel?
My Thoughts: These men knew the scriptures. They had their fulltime jobs but they had studied and talked to each other about the coming. As soon as they had heard and saw that Christ was indeed who they had been waiting for they ran to the others and told them to come and see. We should also be ready to share what we know. We should be in discussions with our friends and family about spiritual things and share what we learn.

What Others have said:
David O. McKay

"One of the two disciples who heard this testimony is named; he was Andrew, the brother of Simon Peter. (See ibid., 1:40.) The other is not named. Indeed throughout the entire book, which, undoubtedly, was written by John himself, the name of John, son of Zebedee, is never once written. In the account of the Last Supper, we read of a 'disciple whom Jesus loved,' who sat so near the Lord that his head could rest on Jesus' bosom.

"These two instances, and others that might be named, indicate to us a prominent trait in John's character; viz., an unassumed modesty that won him the respect and love of all who knew him." (Gospel Ideals: Selections from the Discourses of David O. McKay [Salt Lake City: Improvement Era, 1953], 238.)
 

Bruce R. McConkie
"Now, Jesus' ministry lasted three and a half years and Peter was with him virtually all that time. Initially, apparently, he did not spend his full time at it; he went off with his partners James and John into the fishing enterprise that they ran...when the time came for the call of the Twelve and for him to come and devote his full time to the ministry, Jesus met him and his two partners on the shore of the Sea of Galilee, and said: 'Come ye after me, and I will make you to become fishers of men' (Mark 1:17)." (Sermons and Writings of Bruce R. McConkie [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1998], 129.)

 
David O. McKay
"Accepting the invitation of Jesus to go with Him to the place where He stayed, these two men remained with Him, listening to His words all the rest of the day. When they left, they believed that Jesus was the King of Israel, the Savior of the world. Thus they became, in that day the first two, beside John the Baptist, to believe in Jesus.

"Whenever we have anything which is really good, we always desire to share it with one we love. It was so with these two brothers. They no sooner felt the divine influence that radiated from the Savior than they were filled with a desire to bring those whom they loved under that same influence." (Ancient Apostles [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1964], 13.)
John 1:45–51

 What did Nathanael do that helped him gain a testimony of the Savior?
My thoughts: He questioned if it was true but then he went to see for himself. We need to do the same. Testimony requires effort on our part it is not just given to us without action.

 

 

Friday, December 28, 2018

Lehi's Dream a simple thing I missed before

As I was reading Lehi's Dram in 1 Nephi Chapter 8 I had a simple point jump out at me that I had not thought of before:
Two groups of people that came to the tree an partook of the fruit. The first:
24 And it came to pass that I beheld others pressing forward, and they came forth and caught hold of the end of the rod of iron; and they did press forward through the mist of darkness, clinging to the rod of iron, even until they did come forth and partake of the fruit of the tree.
25 And after they had partaken of the fruit of the tree they did cast their eyes about as if they were ashamed.
Then the second:
30 But, to be short in writing, behold, he saw other multitudes pressing forward; and they came and caught hold of the end of the rod of iron; and they did press their way forward, continually holding fast to the rod of iron, until they came forth and fell down and partook of the fruit of the tree.
These simple words that is what is different about these two groups hit me very strongly.
The difference from those that left and those that stayed was falling down. I brought this up to my wife and she said; Of course, they were humble, they knew the truth.
I agree with that but also think it is that they understood the Atonement. They knew the tree and fruit were much more than a tree and fruit.
These are members who are truly converted and living the gospel as opposed to the first group who are those that are social members. They are active in Church and meetings but not active in the gospel.

Just some thoughts.


Thursday, December 27, 2018

NT Come Follow Me -Individual-2019-January 7–13

Come Follow Me Individual lesson 2
Matthew 1, Luke 1

Who were Matthew and Luke?

New Testament: Student Study guide, (2003), 9–38
Who Was Matthew?
Matthew was a publican, or tax collector, for the Roman government (see Matthew 9:9). He left his profession to follow the Savior and became one of the original Twelve Apostles. He was also known as Levi (see Mark 2:14). For more information about Matthew, see “Matthew” in the Bible Dictionary (p. 729).
Why Did Matthew Write This Book?
If the prophecies of the Old Testament and the events in the life of Jesus Christ were compared to links in two separate chains, Matthew’s testimony could be considered a link that joins the two together. Matthew quoted the Old Testament more than any other New Testament writer. The first verses of Matthew show the coming of Jesus as a continuation of the Old Testament story. As you read, you will find that Matthew continually emphasized that Jesus fulfilled the promises and prophecies of the Old Testament 
 In addition to showing how Jesus fulfilled Old Testament prophecies about the Messiah, Matthew taught how Jesus Christ gave a law that was greater than the law of Moses practiced by the Jews in the Old Testament (see Matthew 5–7; especially note Matthew 5:21–22, 27–28, 31–32, 38–42). Matthew also told more stories than Mark, Luke, or John about how the leaders of the Jews rejected Jesus in spite of the many testimonies that He was their Messiah. This emphasis on Jesus being the fulfillment of Old Testament law and prophecy seems to indicate that Matthew had a Jewish audience in mind when he wrote and that he wanted them to know that Jesus was their Messiah.
Only in Matthew
Although many of the teachings and stories of Jesus appear in more than one of the Gospels, the following are found only in Matthew:
••
Some of the details surrounding Jesus’ birth, such as the story of Joseph’s dream and decision to marry Mary (see Matthew 1:18–20), the visit of the wise men (see Matthew 2:1–13), and going to Egypt to avoid Herod and the killing of the children (see Matthew 2:14–18)
••
The complete Sermon on the Mount (see Matthew 5–7)
••
Ten parables not in the other Gospels
••
 The resurrection and appearance of Saints after the Resurrection of the Savior (see Matthew 27:52–53)
••
Some often quoted and important sayings of Jesus, such as, “Come unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest” (Matthew 11:28)
Who Was Luke?
Luke was a Greek physician, a doctor who wrote this gospel and the book of Acts. Luke was not a Jew, but was well educated in his Greek culture. He was probably not an eyewitness to the Savior’s earthly ministry but learned about Jesus from the Apostle Paul and other missionaries. He went on many missionary journeys with Paul (see Acts 16:10; 2 Timothy 4:11) and witnessed the growth of the Church among the Gentiles
Why Was This Book Written?
Luke wrote this testimony so his friend Theophilus, probably also a Greek convert, would know the truth about Jesus Christ. Evidently there were numerous other accounts of what Jesus said and did, some true and some not true. It seems Luke had a non-Jewish audience in mind, since he gives the meaning of mny Hebrew words and tells several stories of Jesus’ dealings with non-Jews.
How Is This Book Different from Matthew and Mark?
Matthew’s gospel was written to show the Jews that Jesus fulfilled the Old Testament prophecies of the promised Messiah (see the introduction to the book of Matthew on p. 9). Mark showed Jesus as the powerful Son of God who performed many miracles, the greatest being the Atonement (see the introduction to the book of Mark on p. 39). As a Gentile, Luke had a unique perspective on the gospel of Jesus Christ. Luke’s testimony is the longest of the Gospels. It contains much information not mentioned by the other gospel writers. He understood that the gospel was for all people, not just the Jews, and he emphasized that Jesus suffered and died for all of Heavenly Father’s children.
Only in Luke
The following are some of the teachings found only in Luke:
••
Gabriel’s visits to Zacharias and Mary (see Luke 1:5–20, 26–38)
••
Details of the birth of Jesus Christ in Bethlehem (see Luke 2:1–20)
••
The testimonies of Simeon and Anna (see Luke 2:21–38)
••
The twelve-year-old Jesus at the temple (see Luke 2:40–52)
••
The parables found in Luke 10–19 
••
The calling of the seventy (see Luke 10:1–16)
••
Christ bleeding from every pore in Gethsemane (see Luke 22:44)
••
Jesus telling the thief on the cross that he would be with Him in paradise (see Luke 23:39–43)
 



Who Are Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John?

By Janet Thomas
Church Magazines
A doctor, a fisherman, a tax collector, and another who was just a teenager when he heard the Savior speak, they wrote some of the most famous books in existence. 
We recognize their names immediately. Their names are attached to the first four books of the New Testament. And most important of all, their writings are almost all we have describing the mortal life of Jesus Christ and the things He said.
The first four books of the New Testament are called the Gospels. It’s easy to imagine why these books were written and why they have always been so important. Can you imagine how exciting it would have been for people who were just learning about the Savior to have someone read to them the things He said and did? These books have always been precious.
Matthew and John were two of the original Twelve Apostles. They were with the Savior often as He taught. But who were Mark and Luke, and how did they come to write about the Savior’s life and ministry?
Here are a few things scholars know about the four men who wrote their testimonies of the Savior.1
Matthew
Matthew was a publican, or tax collector, before he was called as one of the Lord’s Apostles. Because of that profession, we can guess that he was well educated and knew how to read and write, probably in several languages, including Greek. He also knew arithmetic. He saw and heard many wonderful things while with the Savior, and it is likely he wrote down some of the sayings of the Savior as notes or in a journal. Later, these notes would have helped him when he wrote what he remembered about the teachings of Jesus.
In his book, Matthew often stresses that Jesus Christ is the Messiah and came to fulfill the Old Testament prophecies. Matthew wrote specifically to the Jews, who were familiar with those prophecies.
Matthew was a man who could have moved comfortably in political circles, and his book mentions things that someone in his position would know. For example, his account of the Resurrection tells that those assigned to guard the Savior’s tomb saw two angels roll back the stone that covered the door of the tomb. They told their superiors what had happened, so the soldiers were offered large sums of money to say that the Lord’s followers had crept in and carried His body away. This lie was then spread among the Jews. (See Matthew 28:2–15.) Matthew must have been informed about the bribery. The book of Matthew is the only place this interesting bit of information is told.
Luke
Luke is an interesting writer because he did not know Jesus Christ personally. He became a follower after the Lord’s death, when Paul taught him the gospel. Luke had been a physician, but he left that profession to travel with Paul. He had the opportunity to talk with many of the Apostles as well as others who were eyewitnesses to special events or moments in the Lord’s life. In the first few verses of his book, Luke says that he is going to write the things that eyewitnesses and other teachers of the gospel had to say about the Savior. Apparently he had the opportunity to talk to many who were present when the Savior taught or performed miracles.
One of the most amazing stories Luke wrote about was the birth of the Savior. Elder Bruce R. McConkie (1915–85) of the Quorum of the Twelve Apostles says that Luke probably got his information about Jesus’s birth from Mary herself.
Who were the other people Luke interviewed about Jesus Christ? The list would have been long. Many of the people who knew the Savior would still have been alive and would have remembered such important times in their lives. Paul mentions that about 500 people saw the Savior after His Resurrection and that most of them were still alive when he was writing to the Corinthians (see 1 Corinthians 15:6).
Four Separate Books
Right after the Lord’s death and Resurrection and for many years afterward, each of the books written by Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John was a separate item, written on a separate scroll and copied over and over. The individual books weren’t put together into the New Testament until several hundred years after they were written. This explains John’s warning in Revelation 22:18: “If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book.” Some people have interpreted this to mean that no other scriptures could be revealed after the book of Revelation, which in modern times is the last book of the Bible. But John was most likely warning people not to add anything to his writing only in the book of Revelation.
Eventually the four Gospels were joined with other valuable writings such as the letters that Paul and others wrote. Other original Apostles also wrote things that were copied repeatedly. Remnants of these writings survive, but it is difficult to determine which are authentic. When the New Testament was gathered into a single book, these writings were not included.



Why did the Savior need to be born of a mortal mother and an immortal Father?
My Thoughts: Christ had to be part mortal she would truly understand what we would go through. He had to know physical pain, hurt , emotion so the atonement could be truly universal. He also needed to be part God to have the ability to endure the atonement. I also think it is partly due so that he could truly say He suffered for us willingly even though He had the power and ability to change it all with just a thought.
Matt 1:18-25 Luke 1:28-35

Bruce R. McConkie
"The commentaries of the world talk about the virgin birth as being 'pious fiction.' No one, they say, could have been born in that way; it was something which Matthew assumed, and so it became a tradition in the early Church. This matter of the genealogy, this matter of the birth of our Lord, is at the heart and core of Christendom. Thanks be to God that by the opening of the heavens and by revelation in our day we have gained an understanding of what is involved. As a result we can put the atoning sacrifice in its proper position and relationship to all things...Whose son is he? He is the firstborn spirit child of God, our Heavenly Father." ("Who Shall Declare His Generation?" BYU Studies, vol. 16 (1975-1976), Number 4 - Summer 1976, p. 555.)
Bruce R. McConkie
"Just as Jesus is literally the son of Mary, so he is the personal and literal offspring of God the Eternal Father, who himself is an exalted personage having a tangible body of flesh and bones...Matthew's statement, 'she was found with child of the Holy Ghost,' properly translated should say, 'she was found with child by the power of the Holy Ghost.'" (Doctrinal New Testament Commentary, 1:82.)

Ezra Taft Benson
"The most fundamental doctrine of true Christianity is the divine birth of the child Jesus. This doctrine is not generally comprehended by the world. The paternity of Jesus Christ is one of the 'mysteries of godliness' comprehended only by the spiritually-minded.
"The apostle Matthew recorded: 'Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise: When as his mother Mary was espoused to Joseph, before they came together, she was found with child of the Holy Ghost.' (Matthew 1:18.)
"Luke rendered a plainer meaning to the divine conception. He quoted the angel Gabriel's words to Mary: 'The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy [being] which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God.' (Luke 1:35; italics added.)
"Some six hundred years before Jesus was born, an ancient prophet had a vision. He saw Mary and described her as 'a virgin, most beautiful and fair above all other virgins.' He then saw her 'carried away in the Spirit . . . for the space of a time.' When she returned, she was 'bearing a child in her arms . . . even the Son of the Eternal Father.' (Book of Mormon, 1 Ne. 11:15; 1 Ne. 11:19-21.)

"Thus the testimonies of appointed witnesses leave no question as to the paternity of Jesus Christ. God was the Father of Jesus' mortal tabernacle, and Mary, a mortal woman, was His mother. He is therefore the only person born who rightfully deserves the title 'the Only Begotten Son of God.'
"From the time of Christ's heaven-heralded birth, heresies have crept into Christianity intended to dilute or undermine the pure doctrines of the gospel. These heresies, by and large, are sponsored by the philosophies of men and, in many instances, advocated by so-called Christian scholars. Their intent is to make Christianity more palatable, more reasonable, and so they attempt to humanize Jesus and give natural explanations to those things which are divine.
"An example is Jesus' birth. The so-called scholars seek to convince us that the divine birth of Christ as proclaimed in the New Testament was not divine at all and that Mary was not a virgin at the time of Jesus' conception. They would have us believe that Joseph, the foster-father of Jesus, was His physical father, and that therefore Jesus was human in all attributes and characteristics. They appear generous in their praise of Him when they say that He was a great moral philosopher, perhaps even the greatest. But the import of their effort is to repudiate the divine Sonship of Jesus, for on that doctrine rest all other claims of Christianity.
"The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints proclaims that Jesus Christ is the Son of God in the most literal sense. The body in which He performed His mission in the flesh was sired by that same Holy Being we worship as God, our Eternal Father. Jesus was not the son of Joseph, nor was He begotten by the Holy Ghost. He is the Son of the Eternal Father!" (Come unto Christ [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1983], 2-4.)

Elder Eldred G. Smith
"Jesus Christ was the literal Son of God the Father by his spirit body and also by his physical body. The difference between Christ and us is that he had the same Father for his spirit body that he had for his physical body. But He had a mortal mother on earth. The scriptures say that she was overshadowed by the Holy Ghost. (See Luke 1:35.) Of course there had to be some means of making this possible while she was still in mortality. Further details are not necessary, but Christ himself declared all his life that he was the Son of God, and he meant it. That is the reason He had power to break the bonds of death and bring about the resurrection. It was not because He was crucified on the cross. Many people have been crucified on a cross. There were two crucified on crosses at the sides of him, but they did not have the power to be resurrected. But Christ had the power to be resurrected." (March 10, 1964, BYU Speeches of the Year, 1964, p. 8)

Luke 1:5-25, 57-80

Bruce R. McConkie

"Twice each year, in April and October, the priests of the course of Abia, named for Abijah, traveled from their village homes to the House of the Lord in Jerusalem, there to take their week-long turns at performing those sacred rites and ordinances which for fifteen hundred years had been the center of Israel's worship. One of these priests, Zacharias, whose wife, Elisabeth, was both barren and past the childbearing age, dwelt in a village in the hill country of Judea, believed to be Hebron. It was the very locale where Abraham had lived with Sarah, who also was both barren and past the childbearing age when the Lord himself saw fit to tell the Father of the Faithful that his beloved Sarah would conceive and bear Isaac, through whom the blessings of the Abrahamic covenant would continue.
"It was October, the autumn of the year, when Zacharias left his beloved Elisabeth-both of them being in the autumn of their lives-to travel the some twenty lonely miles to Jerusalem. At least it was the custom to leave family members at home, for the priests dwelt in the temple itself during their week-long ministry. But perhaps he went with other priests of his course, and if so, as was common among them in that era of great expectation, they would have discussed the Consolation of Israel who was to come and deliver his people...With his fellow priests, he then drew lots, as was the custom, so that each of the sons of Aaron serving that week might be assigned his duties. There was one service, favored above all others, that a priest to whose lot it fell might perform but once in a lifetime. It was the burning of incense on the altar of incense in the Holy Place, near the Holy of Holies where the very presence of Jehovah came on occasion. And, lo, this time the lot fell to Zacharias; he was chosen of the Lord to perform the great mediatorial service in which the smoke of the incense, ascending to heaven, would symbolize the prayers of all Israel ascending to the divine throne. That Zacharias was to be the central figure in the temple, through this service, all the assembled worshippers knew; and that heaven itself was to respond with divine approval shining forth, they would soon learn." (The Mortal Messiah: From Bethlehem to Calvary, 4 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979-1981], 1: 306-307.)


Neal A. Maxwell
"Faith in God includes faith in His timing. Frankly, some of us have some difficulty with this significant dimension of faith. We clearly prefer our own time to His 'own due time.'
"...Patience stretches our capacity to bide our time while both wondering and sustaining. This vital elasticity will be especially needed as part of maintaining faith in God's timing in the last days, during which 'all things must come to pass in their time' (D&C 64:32)." (That Ye May Believe [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1992], 51-53.)


How did Zacharias and Elisabeth remain faithful?
My Thoughts: Even though they did not have the prayers answered nor were they blessed with what they thought would make them a model family in the Church, they were denied, yet they were still active and faithful. How many of us stop being active in the gospel simply because our prayers don’t seem to be answered.

What other messages might the Lord have for you in this story?
Have faith in His timing in all things. Life often doesn’t turn out like you plan but if you trust the Lord it turns out how it should and you are better for it.


The faithful willingly submit to God’s will.

Luke 1:26-38
"As we begin reading their story, we learn immediately that Joseph and Mary are 'espoused' (Matt. 1:18). Espousal among the Hebrews was significantly more binding than are our engagements today. The couple entered into it by written agreement and considered it the formal beginning of the marriage itself. While the couple might not actually live together for as much as a year after the betrothal-a time designed to allow the bride to prepare her dowry-the espousal was as legally binding as the formal marriage." (Gerald N. Lund, Selected Writings of Gerald N. Lund: Gospel Scholars Series [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1999], 136)
On Mary:
Bruce R. McConkie
"As there is only one Christ, so there is only one Mary. And as the Father chose the most noble and righteous of all his spirit sons to come into mortality as his Only Begotten in the flesh, so we may confidently conclude that he selected the most worthy and spiritually talented of all his spirit daughters to be the mortal mother of his Eternal Son." (Doctrinal New Testament Commentary. 3 vols. Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1965-73, 1:85.)

Russell M. Nelson
"I applaud the efforts of Latter-day Saints throughout the world who willingly serve in building the kingdom of God. Likewise, I respect those who quietly do their duty though deepening trials come their way. And I admire those who strive to be more worthy by overcoming a personal fault or who work to achieve a difficult goal.
"I feel impressed to counsel those engaged in personal challenges to do right. In particular, my heart reaches out to those who feel discouraged by the magnitude of their struggle. Many shoulder heavy burdens of righteous responsibility which, on occasion, seem so difficult to bear. I have heard those challenges termed impossible.
"As a medical doctor, I have known the face of adversity. I have seen much of death and dying, suffering and sorrow. I also remember the plight of students overwhelmed by their studies and of those striving to learn a foreign language. And I recall the fatigue and frustration felt by young parents with children in need. Amidst circumstances seemingly impossible, I have also experienced the joyous relief that comes when one's understanding is deepened by scriptural insight.
"...Isaiah had made this prophetic utterance: 'The Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel.' (Isa 7:14)
"When Mary was notified of her sacred responsibility, the announcing angel reassured, 'For with God nothing shall be impossible.'
"...We are children of the noble birthright, who must carry on in spite of our foredetermined status to be broadly outnumbered and widely opposed. Challenges lie ahead for the Church and for each member divinely charged toward self-improvement and service.
"How is it possible to achieve the 'impossible'? Learn and obey the teachings of God. From the holy scriptures, heaven-sent lift will be found for heaven-sent duties." (Perfection Pending, and Other Favorite Discourses [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1998], 105-108.)

Neal A. Maxwell
"The marvelous, spiritually submissive Mary likewise expressed it (true submissiveness) in few words. Though filled with wonderment about the miraculous impending birth of Jesus, she said, 'Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word' ("luke 1:38Luke 1:38).
"Her words can guide us when we too are puzzled by what is impending or unfolding in our lives. When we cannot explain all that is happening to us or around us, we can adopt Nephi's position: 'I know that [God] loveth his children; nevertheless, I do not know the meaning of all things' (1 Nephi 11:17)." (Sermons Not Spoken [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1985], 8-9.)

Thomas S. Monson
"In our selection of heroes, let us nominate also heroines...I speak of Mary of Nazareth, espoused to Joseph, destined to become the mother of the only truly perfect man to walk the earth. Her acceptance of this sacred and historic role is a hallmark of humility. 'And Mary said, Behold the handmaid of the Lord; be it unto me according to thy word.' (Luke 1:38.) Surely Mary qualifies.
"Could we ask, What makes of these men heroes and these women heroines? I answer: Unwavering trust in an all-wise Heavenly Father and an abiding testimony concerning the mission of a divine Savior. This knowledge is like a golden thread woven through the tapestry of their lives." (Be Your Best Self [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979], 40.)

Chieko N. Okazaki
"Mary's example teaches us much about giving the answer of faith when things happen that we don't understand, about trusting in the Lord when things happen that try us and challenge our faith, about having confidence in his goodness at seasons of loss and sorrow.
"We are so used to thinking of the annunciation as the beginning of the joyous celebration of Christmas that we focus on Mary's joy, which I'm sure she felt, and on the great gladness of the Savior's birth. We are not used to thinking of this season as a time of loss for Mary. But it was a loss. She was a righteous young woman, but she was bound to lose her reputation among her family and friends and those who knew her in Nazareth. What else could they think, when they saw her pregnant, but that she had been unchaste? The last line in the annunciation is, 'And the angel departed from her' (v. 38). In other words, the angel didn't take the rabbi aside for a quiet chat about this very special young woman he had in town. He didn't whisper to the chief merchants that Mary was going to be remembered till the end of time, while their names would barely survive their own generation. The angel was not there at the well when Mary went for water, after she came back from visiting Elisabeth, her body already rounded with a sixth-month pregnancy. He didn't explain to the other women, shocked and scandalized and whispering to each other behind their hands, that Mary was the chosen vessel of the Lord. Nobody explained to the girls younger than Mary that she was the living embodiment of faith.
"Furthermore, Mary didn't explain it either. She obviously didn't explain it even to Joseph, because Joseph was the one person to whom the angel did come, to tell him that his faith in Mary was not misplaced. So, yes, I think we have to admit that despite the joy this was also a season of loss and mourning." (Disciples [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1998], 165 - 166.)



The angel’s words to Mary
Message for me
“The Lord is with thee” (verse 28).
The Lord is aware of my situation and struggles.

His timing is always right. What He requires is always right


Mary’s reactions
Message for me
“How shall this be?” (verse 34).
It’s OK to ask questions when I don’t understand.

As you ask questions you need to be ready to follow the answer no matter what.





As you read about Joseph’s righteous example in Matthew 1:18–25, what do you learn about accepting God’s will? What could you learn from Zacharias’s and Elisabeth’s experiences?
They were active and fulfilled their duty with faith even when their prayers and desires were not answered


What do you learn about Jesus Christ from Mary’s statements? What additional insights do you gain about the blessings that the Savior offers by comparing these verses with Hannah’s words in 1 Samuel 2:1–10 and with Jesus’s Beatitudes in Matthew 5:4–12? What does the Spirit teach you as you ponder these insights?

Ideas for Family Scripture Study and Family Home Evening

Matthew 1:1–17
James E. Talmage
"Two genealogical records purporting to give the lineage of Jesus are found in the New Testament, one in the first chapter of Matthew, the other in the third chapter of Luke. These records present several apparent discrepancies, but such have been satisfactorily reconciled by the research of specialists in Jewish genealogy. No detailed analysis of the matter will be attempted here; but it should be borne in mind that the consensus of judgment on the part of investigators is that Matthew's account is that of the royal lineage, establishing the order of sequence among the legal successors to the throne of David, while the account given by Luke is a personal pedigree, demonstrating descent from David without adherence to the line of legal succession to the throne through primogeniture or nearness of kin. Luke's record is regarded by many, however, as the pedigree of Mary, while Matthew's is accepted as that of Joseph. The all important fact to be remembered is that the Child...would be born in the royal line. A personal genealogy of Joseph was essentially that of Mary also, for they were cousins." (Jesus the Christ, p. 81)

Bruce R. McConkie
"...Matthew proceeds to outline what appears to be the ancestry of the Lord, but we can't quite figure out how it fits in with other scriptural passages, at least in the form it has come to us. Luke gives another account that does not agree with that in the book of Matthew. We suppose it may be that one of them is a kingly, royal genealogy, intended to indicate his position and place as the one to sit upon the throne of his father David; the other is possibly a genealogy either of Mary or Joseph-we can't be sure." ("Who Shall Declare His Generation?" BYU Studies, vol. 16 (1975-1976), Number 4 - Summer 1976, p. 555.)

Neal A. Maxwell
"We can wait, as we must, to learn later whether ... Matthew's or Luke's account of Jesus' Davidic descent is correct. (See Matt. 1; Luke 3.) Meanwhile, the Father has, on several occasions, given us Jesus' crucial genealogy: 'This is My Beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased. Hear Him!'" (Ensign, November 1984, p. 11.)

"Matthew placed great stress upon the King and his kingdom. Messiah is a royal title, and Jesus' royal/messianic status was critically important to Matthew. The genealogy of Jesus given in Matthew (1:1-17) is the Lord's royal line. Matthew laid out the genealogy in such a manner as to divide the forty-two generations into three sections of fourteen (from Abraham to David, from David to Babylonian captivity, and from exile to Jesus). For Matthew, the very number fourteen has royal significance. How so? The name David in Hebrew consists of three Hebrew consonants, each having numerical equivalents. Thus: Dahlet (d =4) + Vav (v =6) + Dahlet (d =4) =14." (Robert L. Millet, Studies in Scripture, Vol. 5: The Gospels, edited by Kent P. Jackson and Robert L. Millet, p. 33)

JST Matt 2:1 Now, as it is written, the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise
"In the preparation of his Gospel, Matthew would no doubt have drawn upon his own reminiscences and notes, as well as other extant oral or written sources. After providing the genealogy of Jesus Christ, Matthew records (1:18): 'Now the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise . . .' The Matthean infancy narrative follows. Joseph Smith's translation of the same verse (JST, Matt. 2:1) reads: 'Now, as it is written, the birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise . . .' This prophetic alteration of the King James text seems to point toward the possibility of a written source available to the apostle that predates his own Gospel." (Robert L. Millet, Studies in Scripture, Vol. 5: The Gospels, edited by Kent P. Jackson and Robert L. Millet, p. 33)

Matthew 1:20; Luke 1:13,30
"All righteous prayers are answered, but in the due time of the Lord. There may be some delay until his time is due, as a man well-stricken in years learned when Gabriel appeared to him and said: 'Fear not, Zacharias: for thy prayer is heard.' (Luke 1:13.) Though the answer was much-delayed, the prayer was answered in God's time. This experience says much about God's need and his timing." (Keith H. Meservy, Studies in Scripture, Vol. 5: The Gospels, ed. by Kent P. Jackson and Robert L. Millet, [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1986], 349.)

Neal A. Maxwell
"Faith in God includes faith in His timing. Frankly, some of us have some difficulty with this significant dimension of faith. We clearly prefer our own time to His 'own due time.'
"...Patience stretches our capacity to bide our time while both wondering and sustaining. This vital elasticity will be especially needed as part of maintaining faith in God's timing in the last days, during which 'all things must come to pass in their time' (D&C 64:32)." (That Ye May Believe [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1992], 51-53.)


Quick thoughts on Angel Gabriel

Joseph Smith taught that the angel Gabriel who came to Mary and Joseph was the prophet Noah in life. I have often wondered why him? Why was he chosen to deliver the message of history?
My Thoughts:
It was his assignment to do so.
Also who better? This shows a loving Father in Heaven and His Son caring for his prophets.
Noah more than any other prophet could have been thought a failure. He was first tasked to cry repentance to the people but they would not listen.
He was then tasked with watching the entire population of the earth be wiped out, "save 8 souls"

Who better to bring the message that the time had come for He who would defeat death and sin was about to be born. Who better than he who saw everyone be destroy because of their narrow minded ness.
Just a thought.