WELCOME

The best advice I can give is from a talk by Elder Oaks: ”Last year a church member sent me a suggestion that someone prepare a book containing all General Authority interpretations of all verses in the scriptures. I replied that I thought this was not a good idea…. What we are seeking to accomplish… is not to magnify the standing of the prophets but to elevate the spirituality of our rank and file members. Like Moses, we declare, ‘would God that all the Lord’s people were prophets, and that the Lord would put his spirit upon them!’ (Numbers 11:29). We encourage everyone to study the scriptures prayerfully and seek personal revelation to know the meaning for themselves.” (Elder Dallin H. Oaks, “Scripture Reading and Revelation”, BYU Studies Academy Meeting, January 29, 1993)

Monday, January 7, 2019

NT Come Follow Me -Individual-2019-January 21–27


Come Follow Me Individual Lesson 4

John 1

 The Gospel of John

Who was John?

The Testimony of St. John

Taken from https://www.gospeldoctrine.com/new-testament/john/john-1
The more one reads the Gospel of John, the more one is impressed with how different this record is from the synoptic gospels. You can almost imagine John, the last surviving apostle, reviewing the records of Matthew, Mark, and Luke, and then concluding that there were many precious morsels left out. This romantic notion-that John was trying to fill in precious gaps in the scriptural history-is not just speculation. Robert L. Millet wrote:

"One ancient tradition states that after Mark and Luke had published their Gospels, John 'admitted them, giving his testimony to their truth.' John, however, recognizing the fact that 'the other three evangelists only wrote the deeds of our Lord for one year after the imprisonment of John the Baptist,' set out to fill in those historical gaps of the synoptic Gospels. 'John, it is said, being entreated to undertake it, wrote the account of the time not recorded by the former evangelists, and the deeds done by our Savior, which they have passed by.' It is reasonable to suppose that John collected and drew upon available sources beyond his own personal records (such as the record of John the Baptist). If indeed John's Gospel was written last, it may well be-in those few areas where his Gospel follows the course of the synoptics-that he would have been acquainted with, had before him, and thus utilized in a discerning manner details from the other three Gospels." (Selected Writings of Robert L. Millet: Gospel Scholars Series [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 2000], 21.)

Consider what a great tragedy it would have been if John had not written his gospel. We would be missing: Christ turning the water into wine (Jn. 2), the interaction between Jesus and Nicodemus (Jn. 3), the passage 'For God so loved the world' (Jn 3:16), the Bread of Life sermon (Jn. 6), the story of the adulterous woman (Jn. 8), the passage 'other sheep I have, which are not of this fold' (Jn. 10:16), the raising of Lazarus from the dead (Jn. 11), the washing of the apostles' feet (Jn. 13), precious doctrines taught during the last supper (Jn. 13-16), the intercessory prayer (Jn. 17), and the conversation of the resurrected Lord with Peter and John (Jn. 21). Furthermore, the tone, style, and content of John's writings are unique and truly sublime.

"In the first four lines we sense already a quality unique to the Gospel of John. It is the same Savior that we knew in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, but now we see him in a new light, with new dimensions of greatness and godhood unfolding before our understanding. This is not just the Messiah of the Jews; this is 'the light' of the whole world, the creator of 'all things.' He 'was with God.' He 'was God.' But he was a God who 'was made flesh and dwelt among us' (John 1:14), and so was known to men-to some only at a distance, to some secondhand. But to a few he was known closely, intimately. And it is the voice of one of those intimates that speaks to us in this Gospel. John, the beloved apostle, had not only heard the words of the living Lord, he had 'leaned on his breast at supper.' (John 21:20.) He not only knew the teachings of Jesus, he knew, in a way we can hardly appreciate, the stirrings of that divine heart. It is the profound depths of that heart and the infinite heights of that divine glory that John presents for us in his Gospel.

"No other single piece fuses so remarkably the mortal and the immortal, the finite and the infinite: a draught of water from a well becomes a metaphor for the living water of the gospel; the bread to feed five thousand becomes a lesser symbol for the more significant bread of life after partaking of which there will be no hunger. The sheep and their shepherd, the vine and its branches, the very stuff of human existence is shown to have meaning and significance far beyond what our own dull senses have suggested." (Neal E. Lambert and Richard H. Cracroft, "The Powerful Voices of the Gospels," New Era, Jan. 1973, 42)

Gordon B. Hinckley

"I like to read the Gospel of John. Over sixty years ago my missionary companion and I started reading the Gospel of John which begins with that great opening statement, 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.' Our reading of the Gospel of John did something to me. And I still love to read the Gospel of John.

'For God so loved the world, that he sent his only begotten son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life' (John 3:16).

'Peace I leave with you, my peace I give unto you: not as the world giveth, give I unto you. Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be afraid' (John 14:27).

"Those are great and marvelous statements that I learned to love in the Gospel of John. We need to do more reading in the scriptures and more dwelling on the Lord Jesus Christ." (Teachings of Gordon B. Hinckley [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1997], 279.)

 John 1:1–5

Jesus Christ was “in the beginning with God.”

My Thoughts: We know that Christ was the God of the Old Testament. He created this earth under the direction on the Father. These verses help me to understand just how much Christ is involed and cares about me. He has been there as my friend and advocate since the very start

What Others have Said:
Bruce R McConkie
From latter-day revelation we learn that the material in the forepart of the gospel of John (the Apostle, Revelator, and Beloved Disciple) was written originally by John the Baptist. By revelation the Lord restored to Joseph Smith part of what John the Baptist had written and promised to reveal the balance when men became sufficiently faithful to warrant receiving it. (D. & C. 93: 6-18.) Verse 15 of this passage is the key to the identity of the particular John spoken of. This verse should be compared with Matt. 3:16-17 to learn the identity of the writer.
Even without revelation, however, it should be evident that John the Baptist had something to do with the recording of events in the forepart of John's gospel, for some of the occurrences include his conversations with the Jews and a record of what he saw when our Lord was baptized-all of which matters would have been unknown to John the Apostle whose ministry began somewhat later than that of the Baptist's. There is little doubt but that the Beloved Disciple had before him the Baptist's account when he wrote his gospel. The latter John either copied or paraphrased[…]”Doctrinal New Testament Commentary
“Though many of the Jews in the meridian of time were in a state of direful and awful apostasy, such darkness of mind and spirit was not universal. It did not envelope the whole nation. Elizabeth and Zacharias were righteous saints. Both were lineal descendants of Aaron, and Zacharias held the office of priest in the Aaronic Priesthood. (Teachings, pp. 272-273.) This lesser priesthood had continued in direct descent, without a break in the line, from Aaron to Zacharias and his son John the Baptist. (D. & C. 84:26-28.)”Doctrinal New Testament Commentary
Joseph Fielding Smith

"[These verses] teach that Jesus Christ is the Son of God and that he was in the beginning with the Father, and by him the world was created, and all things were made (organized) by him.

"Our learned enemies of the Gospel and the divine mission of Jesus Christ, in their overwhelming conceit, will not have it so. They have rejected Jesus Christ as the Son of God. They have rejected him as the Redeemer of the world and the Savior of men. They have denied his Godhood and his resurrection, while they condescendingly permit him to be a merciful and moral teacher of mankind. In fact they think they have learned through their study of science that God could not possibly be an exalted man. He could not be the Father of Jesus Christ in the literal sense as being the Father of his body, for to them God is a force, an influence, a mystery which no man can solve. They have universally ridiculed the idea that there can be an Eternal Father, who could create man in his own image, in the likeness of his body, for their god has no body, he is too great, too mighty, to be confined in a body limited to the dimensions of a man." (Man, His Origin and Destiny [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1954], 61.)

Gordon B. Hinckley

"When I think of the Savior, I think of the words of Matthew, Mark, and Luke but particularly the words of John:

"Here is something spoken of more than a babe in a manger; here is declared the Creator of all that is good and beautiful. I have looked at majestic mountains rising against a blue sky and thought of Jesus, the Creator of heaven and earth. I have stood on a spit of sand in the Pacific and watched the dawn rise like thunder-a ball of gold surrounded by clouds of pink and white and purple-and thought of Jesus, the Word by whom all things were made and without whom was not anything made that was made. I have seen a beautiful child-many of them-bright-eyed, innocent, clean, and trusting, and marveled at the majesty and miracle of creation. What then shall you do with Jesus that is called Christ?

"This earth is his creation. When we make it ugly, we offend him." ("God So Loved the World," New Era, Apr. 1983, 48)

Howard W. Hunter

"The message of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is that there is but one guiding hand in the universe, only one truly infallible light, one unfailing beacon to the world. That light is Jesus Christ, the light and life of the world, the light which one Book of Mormon prophet described as 'a light that is endless, that can never be darkened' (Mosiah 16:9).

"As we search for the shore of safety and peace, whether we be individual women and men, families, communities, or nations, Christ is the only beacon on which we can ultimately rely." (The Teachings of Howard W. Hunter, edited by Clyde J. Williams [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1997], 42.)

What is the JST?


Joseph Smith’s Inspired Translation of the New Testament (Ensign Dec 1986)

Speaking of the Lord’s plans for the “doctrinal restoration,” Elder Bruce R. McConkie stated: “It was his design and purpose to bring forth the Book of Mormon as a new and added witness of the Lord Jesus Christ. Then he would endow his prophets with keys and power and give them direct revelation as to how and in what manner his earthly kingdom should be established anew among men.

“After this—as a crowning achievement—he would begin the perfection of the Bible, a work destined to be greater and have more significance than any of us have yet realized.”

Continuing, Elder McConkie observed: “Thus, the doctrinal restoration is destined to come to pass, first, through the Book of Mormon, second, by direct revelation—a re-revelation—of the doctrines known anciently, and third, by the restoration, by revelation, of [parts of] the Bible, which in spite of its faults has been the most stabilizing force on earth since the day it came into being.” (As quoted in The Joseph Smith Translation: The Restoration of Plain and Precious Things, ed. Monte S. Nyman and Robert L. Millet, Provo, Utah: Religious Studies Center, 1985, pp. 10, 12.)

The work of biblical revision was a mission appointed to the Prophet Joseph Smith (see D&C 76:15); it was an integral “branch of [his] calling.” (History of the Church, 1:238.) The Latter-day Saints came to rejoice in the fact that the Bible was “undergoing the purifying touch by a revelation of Jesus Christ.” (The Latter-day Saints’ Messenger and Advocate, Dec. 1835, p. 229.)

On page one of New Testament Manuscript #1 is the following inscription: “A Translation of the New Testament translated by the power of God.” (See Robert J. Matthews, “A Plainer Translation”: Joseph Smith’s Translation of the Bible, A History and Commentary, Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University Press, 1975, p. 267.) Working under the influence of the spirit of revelation, the Prophet altered some 2,096 verses in the King James text of the New Testament—in addition to his work on the Old Testament. It isn’t possible to discuss here all of the changes. But let’s look at some important doctrinal contributions from the JST of the New Testament.

The early years of Christ. In the infancy narrative, we note a reference in the JST which refers to Jesus as the Messiah, as well as the king. The wise men from the east, seeking to behold and participate in the marvelous event at hand, asked, “Where is the child that is born, the Messiah of the Jews?” (JST, Matt. 2:2; italics added.)

In a passage that does not occur in the King James Version, the JST gives us a remarkable insight into the childhood and early preparation of Christ:

“And it came to pass that Jesus grew up with his brethren, and waxed strong, and waited upon the Lord for the time of his ministry to come.

“And he served under his father, and he spake not as other men, neither could he be taught; for he needed not that any man should teach him.

“And after many years, the hour of his ministry drew nigh.

“And in those days came John the Baptist, preaching in the wilderness of Judea.” (JST, Matt. 3:24–26; Matt. 3:1.)

These verses supply an excellent transition between Christ’s infancy and the beginning of John’s ministry.(Note the lack of transition in the KJV from Matt. 2:23 to Matt. 3:1.) They also explain that the Lord received instructions from the heavens. This suggests one of the reasons Jesus, at age twelve, was spiritually adept and insightful enough to be found in the temple teaching the doctors of the law.(See JST, Luke 2:46–47.)

The ministry of John the Baptist. Jesus taught that “among those that are born of women there is not a greater prophet than John the Baptist.” (Luke 7:28.) Joseph Smith explained that John’s greatness consisted largely of his critically important mission to prepare the way for the Son of Man and then baptize the Lord by proper authority. (See Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith, pp. 275–76.) John “came into the world for a witness, to bear witness of the light, to bear record of the gospel through the Son, unto all, that through him men might believe.” (JST, John 1:7; italics added.)

The JST provides a clearer rendition of John’s preaching and baptism than that contained in other translations. Note the following:

KJV, Matt. 3:11–12

 “I indeed baptize you with water unto repentance: but he that cometh after me is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear: he shall baptize you with the Holy Ghost and with fire: “Whose fan is in his hand.”

JST, Matt. 3:38–39

“I indeed baptize you with water, upon your repentance; and when he of whom I bear record cometh, who is mightier than I, whose shoes I am not worthy to bear, (or whose place I am not able to fill,) as I said, I indeed baptize you before he cometh, that when he cometh he may baptize you with the Holy Ghost and fire.

“And it is he of whom I shall bear record, whose fan shall be in his hand.” (Italics added.)

John was a prophet who spoke with power. His message not only touched the hearts of the common people, but also stirred both fear and respect in some of the leaders of the Jews. For example, “Herod feared John, knowing that he was a just man, and a holy man, and one who feared God and observed to worship him; and when he heard him he did many things for him, and heard him gladly.” (JST, Mark 6:21; italics added.)

Further, John the Baptist’s message included more than announcing the coming Messiah. In the JST, specific doctrines preached by John are given—doctrines that are absent from the King James Bible and that provide a crucial bridge between the events of the Savior’s first and second comings.

“And he [John] came into all the country about Jordan, preaching the baptism of repentance for the remission of sins.

“As it is written in the book of the prophet Esaias; and these are the words, saying, The voice of one crying in the wilderness, Prepare ye the way of the Lord, and make his paths straight.

“For behold, and lo, he shall come, as it is written in the book of the prophets, to take away the sins of the world, and to bring salvation unto the heathen nations, to gather together those who are lost, who are of the sheepfold of Israel;

“Yea, even the dispersed and afflicted; and also to prepare the way, and make possible the preaching of the gospel unto the Gentiles;

“And to be a light unto all who sit in darkness, unto the uttermost parts of the earth; to bring to pass the resurrection from the dead, and to ascend up on high, to dwell on the right hand of the Father,

“Until the fulness of time, and the law and the testimony shall be sealed, and the keys of the kingdom shall be delivered up again unto the Father;

“To administer justice unto all; to come down in judgment upon all, and to convince all the ungodly of their ungodly deeds, which they have committed; and all this in the day that he shall come;

“For it is a day of power; yea, every valley shall be filled, and every mountain and hill shall be brought low; the crooked shall be made straight, and the rough ways made smooth;

“And all flesh shall see the salvation of God.” (JST, Luke 3:3–11.)

Jesus and the Jews. The leaders of the Jews in the first century had perverted the law of Moses through confusing tokens with covenants, ritual with religion, means with ends. Jesus came as the pure fulfillment of the Law and sought to heal the spiritual blindness that had come from “looking beyond the mark.” (Jacob 4:14.) The JST is even more clear than the KJV, revealing Jesus’ challenge to the Jewish intellectuals of his day in the form of a call to a higher righteousness. He questioned their authority, their right to teach and guide the masses in accordance with their narrow interpretation of the Law. The Jewish leaders were deeply schooled in commentary upon the Torah, but lacked the animation that comes with the Spirit of God. Jesus was different; he “taught them as one having authority from God, and not as having authority from the Scribes.” (JST, Matt. 7:37; italics added.)

Some of the most important alterations made by the Prophet Joseph Smith are in the Sermon on the Mount. For one thing, the JST witnesses that this sermon was predominantly for the purpose of apostlic preparation. Note that the following section on judging righteously (chapter seven) is followed in the JST by a scathing denunciation: “And Jesus said unto his disciples, Beholdest thou the Scribes, and the Pharisees, and the Priests, and the Levites? They teach in their synagogues, but do not observe the law, nor the commandments; and all have gone out of the way, and are under sin.

“Go thou and say unto them, Why teach ye men the law and the commandments, when ye yourselves are the children of corruption?

“Say unto them, Ye hypocrites, [note here who it is that the Lord calls a hypocrite], first cast out the beam out of thine own eye; and then shalt thou see clearly to cast out the mote out of thy brother’s eye.” (JST, Matt. 7:6–8.)

Many of the Jews of Christ’s day had reached a state of sterile self-sufficiency wherein they trusted alone in the Law. “We ourselves are righteous,” they were prone to say, “and need not that any man should teach us.” (JST, Matt. 7:14.) Because some had “taken away the key of knowledge, the fulness of the scriptures” (JST, Luke 11:53), people stumbled in spiritual matters. Many of the leaders of the Jews no longer trusted in the efficacy of personal prayer and the spirit of revelation; others had come to doubt the very existence of God. (See JST, Luke 16:19–21.) Those in the meridian of time who were earnest in their hearts partook of the living fruit from the living tree of life offered by Christ and his appointed servants; those who rejected the fruit denied themselves access to God’s new covenant with Israel and spurned fellowship with the Mediator of that covenant.

Doctrinal teachings of Paul. We will here consider segments of two of the Apostle Paul’s epistles—doctrinal areas which have been misunderstood for centuries. Again, through the clarifying lenses provided by the JST, matters which seemed obscure or foreign are made plain and inspiring.

Chapter seven of Romans might well be labeled “Paul: Before and After.” It might also be classified as an explanation of how the power of Christ can change men’s lives. In the King James Version, Paul sounds very much like a helpless and largely depraved individual who has little power to choose good and live according to the things of God. Paul is “carnal, sold under sin.” (Rom. 7:14.) Further, those things which he knows he should do, he does not do; that which he should not do, he does. “Now then it is no more I that do it,” he adds, “but sin that dwelleth in me.” (Rom. 7:17.) It is not difficult to understand how many, from Augustine to Luther to Bible students in our own day, could conclude from Romans 7 that man is basically a depraved creature, incapable of moving in wisdom’s paths.

Through the Prophet’s inspired translation, we come to discern more clearly the character of Paul the Apostle. The JST stresses man’s inabilities to effect righteousness without Christ:

“For we know that the commandment is spiritual; but when I was under the law, I was yet carnal, sold under sin.

“But now I am spiritual; for that which I am commanded to do, I do; and that which I am commanded not to allow, I allow not.

“For what I know is not right I would not do; for that which is sin, I hate.”

Continuing, Paul stated: “Now then, it is no more I that do sin; but I seek to subdue that sin which dwelleth in me.

“For I know that in me, that is, in my flesh, dwelleth no good thing; for to will is present with me, but to perform that which is good I find not, only in Christ.” (JST, Rom. 7:14–16, 18–19; italics added.)

Secondly, some Latter-day Saints have concluded that Paul’s discussion of marriage in 1 Corinthians 7 is inconsistent with the other teachings of the restored gospel. In the King James Version of this chapter, we find the following: “Now concerning virgins. … I suppose therefore that this [the unmarried state] is good for the present distress, I say, that it is good for a man so to be. …

“But this I say, brethren, the time is short: it remaineth, that both they that have wives be as though they had none.” (1 Cor. 7:25–26, 29.) Now note the same verses from the JST: “Now concerning virgins. … I suppose therefore that this is good for the present distress, for a man so to remain that he may do greater good. …

“But I speak unto you who are called unto the ministry. For this I say, brethren, the time that remaineth is but short, that ye shall be sent forth unto the ministry. Even they who have wives, shall be as though they had none; for ye are called and chosen to do the Lord’s work.” (JST, 1 Cor. 7:25–26, 29; italics added.)

The JST restores the needful insight that Paul was addressing himself to members of the Church who had been called as missionaries, those for whom the postponement of marriage would be most appropriate. Of this contribution from the JST, Robert J. Matthews has written: “Paul’s counsel is similar to that given in the Church today, as established in the mission field and as obeyed by the young elders and sisters. Many have had the experience of listening to a mission president counsel the elders and sisters to remain at arm’s length while on the mission assignment and then preach marriage to the people of the mission. (As Paul does in 1 Cor. 11:11; Heb. 13:4.) If all we knew was the instruction given to the missionaries, we would have an incomplete sampling of the teachings of the Church, and consequently an incorrect notion. In like manner, 1 Corinthians 7 is not a true picture of Paul’s whole concept of marriage, but is directed to a temporary situation in the lives of those called into the ministry. There is no contradiction, simply a change in situation.” (“A Plainer Translation,” p. 358.)

Conclusion
Latter-day revelation sheds a brilliant light upon the Bible and allows those who seek to read by that light to become more acquainted with the doings and doctrines of prophets and seers who preceded us by many centuries. In particular, the Book of Mormon, Doctrine and Covenants, and Joseph Smith Translation of the scriptures provide a treasure-house of knowledge concerning the Lord Jesus Christ and the former-day Saints. Another entire area of study (beyond the scope of this article) is the Prophet Joseph Smith’s sermons and addresses, many of which contain the Prophet’s explanation and discussion of biblical passages. (See Teachings of the Prophet Joseph Smith. See also The Words of Joseph Smith, ed. Andrew F. Ehat and Lyndon W. Cook, Provo, Utah: Religious Studies Center, Brigham Young University, 1980.)

Latter-day revelation both confirms and clarifies many of the vital verities contained in the biblical record. We are deeply indebted to the Prophet Joseph Smith and other living oracles of this dispensation for receiving the revelations, collecting the revelations, printing and publishing the revelations, and thus making available to the Saints plain and precious principles once had by earlier peoples. May the Lord grant us the wisdom to walk in the light of those great beacons of understanding which he has revealed in our day.

“Thou Shalt Bring Forth a Son,” by Harry Anderson. © Pacific Press Publishing Association; used by permission.

“Prepare Ye the Way,” by Harry Anderson. © Pacific Press Publishing Association; used by permission.

“Rise and Walk,” by Harry Anderson. © Pacific Press Publishing Association; used by permission.

“For the Great Millennium Shall Come,” by Harry Anderson. © Review and Herald Publishing Association; used by permission.

Show References

Robert L. Millet, a member of the General Church Curriculum Committee, is an assistant professor of ancient scripture at BYU.

 John 1:1-18

 Why do you think that John began his Gospel with these truths?
My Thoughts: John was writing his account after everyone else. He also had access to many records that were kept that are now lost to us. I think he wanted to show the world the Christ that he knew. The loving from the beginning creator that the other writers had missed.

John 1:12
What does it mean to “become the sons of God”?
My Thoughts: No matter what else we might accomplish or not in this life, no one can take away the title Child of God. We need to remember this as we are beat upon by life. We have a royal, God like pedigree.

John 1:18

Has anyone seen God?

My Thoughts: The manual covers what I think. God the Father deals with us through His Son. Christ is our advocate or representative with the Father.
The world at large and Satan would love nothing more than Gods children to believe they do not have access to Him or His love.

 John 1:19–23
Who is Elias, and who is “that prophet”?

Bruce R. McConkie
"What concerns us above all else as to the coming of John...is that he came with power and authority. He first received his errand from the Lord. His was no ordinary message, and he was no unauthorized witness. He was called of God and sent by him, and he represented Deity in the words that he spoke and the baptisms he performed...Luke says: 'The word of God came unto John the son of Zacharias in the wilderness.' Later John is to say: 'He that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me,' such and such things. (John 1:33.) Who sent him we do not know. We do know that 'he was baptized while he was yet in his childhood [meaning, when he was eight years of age], and was ordained by the angel of God at the time he was eight days old unto this power [note it well, not to the Aaronic Priesthood, but] to overthrow the kingdom of the Jews, and to make straight the way of the Lord before the face of his people, to prepare them for the coming of the Lord, in whose hand is given all power.' (D&C 84:24.)" (The Mortal Messiah: From Bethlehem to Calvary, 4 vols. [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1979-1981], 1: 384.)

 
John 1:35–46

 What does your family learn from the people described in these verses about how to share the gospel?
My Thoughts: These men knew the scriptures. They had their fulltime jobs but they had studied and talked to each other about the coming. As soon as they had heard and saw that Christ was indeed who they had been waiting for they ran to the others and told them to come and see. We should also be ready to share what we know. We should be in discussions with our friends and family about spiritual things and share what we learn.

What Others have said:
David O. McKay

"One of the two disciples who heard this testimony is named; he was Andrew, the brother of Simon Peter. (See ibid., 1:40.) The other is not named. Indeed throughout the entire book, which, undoubtedly, was written by John himself, the name of John, son of Zebedee, is never once written. In the account of the Last Supper, we read of a 'disciple whom Jesus loved,' who sat so near the Lord that his head could rest on Jesus' bosom.

"These two instances, and others that might be named, indicate to us a prominent trait in John's character; viz., an unassumed modesty that won him the respect and love of all who knew him." (Gospel Ideals: Selections from the Discourses of David O. McKay [Salt Lake City: Improvement Era, 1953], 238.)
 

Bruce R. McConkie
"Now, Jesus' ministry lasted three and a half years and Peter was with him virtually all that time. Initially, apparently, he did not spend his full time at it; he went off with his partners James and John into the fishing enterprise that they ran...when the time came for the call of the Twelve and for him to come and devote his full time to the ministry, Jesus met him and his two partners on the shore of the Sea of Galilee, and said: 'Come ye after me, and I will make you to become fishers of men' (Mark 1:17)." (Sermons and Writings of Bruce R. McConkie [Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1998], 129.)

 
David O. McKay
"Accepting the invitation of Jesus to go with Him to the place where He stayed, these two men remained with Him, listening to His words all the rest of the day. When they left, they believed that Jesus was the King of Israel, the Savior of the world. Thus they became, in that day the first two, beside John the Baptist, to believe in Jesus.

"Whenever we have anything which is really good, we always desire to share it with one we love. It was so with these two brothers. They no sooner felt the divine influence that radiated from the Savior than they were filled with a desire to bring those whom they loved under that same influence." (Ancient Apostles [Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Co., 1964], 13.)
John 1:45–51

 What did Nathanael do that helped him gain a testimony of the Savior?
My thoughts: He questioned if it was true but then he went to see for himself. We need to do the same. Testimony requires effort on our part it is not just given to us without action.

 

 

No comments:

Post a Comment